Skip to main content

Full text of "USPTO Patents Application 09625745"

See other formats


United States Patent and Trademark Office 



UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 
United States Patent and Trademark OHice 
Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATE^4TS 
P.O.Box 1450 

Alexandria. Virpnia 22313-1450 
www.uspto.gov 



APPLICATION NO- 



FILING DATE 



FIRST NAMED INVENTOR 



ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. 



CONFIRMATION NO. 



09/625,745 



07/26/2000 



22204 7590 01/09/2006 

NIXON PEABODY, LLP 
401 9TH STREET, NW 
SUITE 900 

WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2128 



Albert Henricus Francicus de Heer 



GDTIP004 



8534 



EXAMINER 



AL HASHEMI. SANA A 



ART UNIT 



PAPER NUMBER 



2164 

DATE MAILED: 01/09/2006 



Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. 



PTO-90C (Rev. 10/03) 



OfficB Action Sunimsrv 


Application No. 

09/625,745 


Applicant(s) 

DE HEER ETAL 


Examiner 

Sana Al-Hashemi 


Art Unit 

2164 





- The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address » 
Period for Reply 



A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 1 MONTH(S) OR THIRTY (30) DAYS. 
WHICHEVER IS LONGER, FROM THE MAILING DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION. 

- Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed 
after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. 

- If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. 

- Failure to reply witfiin the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133). 
Any reply received by the OfHce later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any 
earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b). 

Status 

1 )S Responsive to communication(s) filed on 14 October 2005 . 
2a)n This action is FINAL. 2b)l3 Tliis action is non-final. 

3) n Since this application is in condition for allowance except for fomial matters, prosecution as to the merits is 

closed in accordance with the practice under £x parte Quayle, 1935 CD. 11, 453 O.G. 213. 

Disposition of Clainfis 

4) S Claim(s) 1-56 is/are pending in the application. 

4a) Of the above claim(s) is/are withdrawn from consideration. 

5) 0 Claim(s) is/are allowed. 

6) n Claim(s) is/are rejected. 

/)□ Claim(s) is/are objected to. 

8) S Claim(s) 1-56 are subject to restriction and/or election requirement. 

Application Papers 

9) n The specification is objected to by the Examiner. 

10) 0 The drawing(s) filed on is/are: aO accepted or b)n objected to by the Examiner. 

Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a). 
Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the con-ection is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d). 

11) n The oath or declaration is objected to by the Examiner. Note the attached Office Action orfonn PTO-152. 

Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 

12) n Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f). 
a)n All b)n Some * 0)0 None of: 

1 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received. 

2. n Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. . 

3. n Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage 

application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)). 
* See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received. 



Attachnfient(s) 

1) D Notice of References Cited {PTO-892) 4) □ Interview Summary (PTO-413) 

2) □ Notice of Draftsperson's Patent Drawing Review (PTO-948) Paper No(s)/Mail Date. , 

3) □ Information Disclosure Statennent(s) (PTO-1449 or PTO/SB/08) 5) □ Notice of Informal Patent Application (PTO-1 52) 

Paper No(s)/Mail Date . 6) □ Other: . 



U.S. Patent and Trademartt Office 
PTOL-326 (Rev. 7-05) 



Office Action Summary 



Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20060104 



Application/Control Number: 09/625,745 Page 2 

Art Unit: 2164 

DETAILED ACTION 

1 . This action is issued in response to Applicant's RCE filed 10/14/05. 

2. Claims 1-26 were amended. Claims 27-56 were added. No claims were canceled. 

3. Claims 1-56 are pending. 

Election/Restrictions 

This application contains claims directed to the following patentably distinct species of 
the claimed invention: 

Species I, Claims 1-26, and 29-35 drawn to 8B. 
Species II, Claims 27-28, drawn to Fig. lOA. 
Species III, Claims 36-49, drawn to Fig. 12B. 
Species VI, Claims 50-56, drawn to Fig. 9C. 



Applicant is required under 35 U.S.C. 121 to elect a single disclosed species for 
prosecution on the merits to which the claims shall be restricted if no generic claim is finally 
held to be allowable. Currently, No Claims are generic. 

Applicant is advised that a reply to this requirement must include an identification of the 
species that is elected consonant with this requirement, and a listing of all claims readable 



Application/Control Number: 09/625,745 Page 3 

Art Unit: 2164 

thereon, including any claims subsequently added. An argument that a claim is allowable or that 
all claims are generic is considered nonresponsive unless accompanied by an election. 

Upon the allowance of a generic claim, applicant will be entitled to consideration of 
claims to additional species which are written in dependent form or otherwise include all the 
limitations of an allowed generic claim as provided by 37 CFR 1.141. If claims are added after 
the election, applicant must indicate which are readable upon the elected species. MPEP § 
809.02(a). 

Should applicant traverse on the ground that the species are not patentably distinct, 
applicant should submit evidence or identify such evidence now of record showing the species to 
be obvious variants or clearly admit on the record that this is the case. In either instance, if the 
examiner finds one of the inventions unpatentable over the prior art, the evidence or admission 
may be used in a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) of the other invention. 



Application/Control Number; 09/625,745 
Art Unit: 2164 



Page 4 



Point of Contact 



Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the 
examiner should be directed to Sana Al-Hashemi whose telephone number is 571-272-4013. 
The examiner can normally be reached on 8Am-4:30Pm. 

If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's 
supervisor, Charles Rones can be reached on 571-272-4085. The fax phone number for the 
organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. 

Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent 
Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications 
may be obtained from either Private PAIR or PubHc PAIR. Status information for unpublished 
applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR 
system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR 
system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). 



SfCnsk Al-Hashemi 
Patent Examiner 
Technology Center 2100